NRB ratio schedule · Term 36 of 65

Capital fund to risk-weighted assets (capital adequacy ratio)

पूँजीकोष अनुपात

The bank's loss cushion as a percent of its risky assets. NRB requires at least 11% for commercial banks.

Worked on NABIL FY 2082/83 Q4Updated 2026-10-14

NABIL capital fund to risk-weighted assets (capital adequacy ratio), last 8 quarterly reports

Per cent
NABIL capital fund to risk-weighted assets (capital adequacy ratio), last 8 quarterly reports; the figures are in the table below.
NABIL capital fund to risk-weighted assets (capital adequacy ratio), last 8 quarterly reports
2081/82 Q12081/82 Q22081/82 Q32081/82 Q42082/83 Q12082/83 Q22082/83 Q32082/83 Q4
12.64%11.78%12.02%11.94%12.67%12.77%12.51%12.37%

As printed in each report.

What it is

A bank lends depositors' money. If loans go bad, someone must absorb the loss before depositors do. That someone is the bank's own capital.

The capital adequacy ratio asks: how big is that cushion compared with the risk the bank is carrying? Risk is measured by 'risk-weighted assets' (RWA): each asset is multiplied by a weight for how risky it is. Cash and government bonds weigh 0%; an ordinary business loan weighs 100%; some loans weigh more.

Capital fund = Tier 1 (core: share capital, reserves) + Tier 2 (supplementary: qualifying debentures, general loan loss provision). Divide by RWA to get the ratio.

NRB's Capital Adequacy Framework 2015 sets a minimum total capital ratio of 8.5% plus a 2.5% capital conservation buffer, so 11% in practice for commercial banks. The 2015 framework also allows a countercyclical buffer of up to 2.5%, which NRB has kept suspended.

How it is calculated

Capital fund to RWA (%) = (Tier 1 capital + Tier 2 capital) ÷ Total risk-weighted assets × 100.

Worked on Nabil Bank Limited, FY 2082/83 Q4

NABIL reported a capital fund to risk-weighted assets ratio of 12.37% at the end of FY 2082/83 Q4, against NRB's 11% requirement. Its Tier 1 ratio was 9.68% and CET1 8.87%.

What good looks like

Comfortably above 11% with room to spare. A bank sitting just above the line cannot grow loans or pay cash dividends freely; it must raise capital first. Much higher is safe but may mean capital is sitting idle.

Watch out

  • Share capital alone is not 'capital fund'; the ratio uses the full regulatory definition.
  • A bank near 11% often pays bonus shares instead of cash to build capital.
  • The ratio falls when loans grow fast, even with no new losses, because RWA grows.
  • Quarterly ratios are unaudited; year-end audit adjustments can lower it.

In Nepal

NRB Capital Adequacy Framework 2015 (Basel III based): minimum CET1 4.5%, Tier 1 6%, total capital 8.5%, plus a 2.5% capital conservation buffer, giving 11% total; a countercyclical buffer of up to 2.5% is provided for but suspended by NRB directive. Cash dividends require meeting CAR, and an NRB directive asked for an additional 1% buffer for cash dividends. Falling below triggers Prompt Corrective Action under NRB's PCA Bylaws 2017 (dividend ban, branch and pay freezes).

Questions

NRB applies Prompt Corrective Action: no dividends or bonus shares, limits on new branches and lending, and a recapitalisation plan is required.

Roughly, the cushion is twice as thick. But very high ratios can mean the bank is not lending enough to earn a good return.

Bonus shares keep profit inside the bank as capital, which lifts this ratio. Cash dividends reduce capital.

The market, in your pocket

Live NEPSE, your portfolio and every calculator, free on iOS and Android.